- Investment Insight
- 5 minute read
In recent years, we have all become used to retail going big, whether ‘bricks’ or ‘clicks’: out of town shopping centres, massive malls and on-line conglomerates which sell us whatever we want whenever we want it. Big, instant and cheap might sum it up. This trend has to some extent also pervaded the investment management industry, with fund supermarkets and multi-trillion dollar asset managers soaking up investors’ cash in a highly competitive market. However, critical mass is not always easy to achieve in investments, or sustainable even at such scale. Occasionally closures result.
The proliferation of Exchange Traded Products (ETPs)1, like ETFs, since the Global Financial Crisis is one manifestation of quick and cheap retail, as ever greater flows have been attracted to passive investments over the last decade. Yet, whilst this is broadly acknowledged as an almost irreversible trend, ETP closures have not caused such a stir to date.
Over and out
According to data analyst and provider Bloomberg, there were over 1,000 ETP closures globally in 2018.2 Among last year’s casualties were:
- UBS MSCI World Select Factor Mix ETF closed in November citing low levels of AUM as a key reason.3
- 13 X-trackers ETFs from German asset manager DWS closed in October as a result of “persistently low levels of investor demand and fund sizes that have consistently remained below the Minimum Fund Size”.4
In the majority of cases, after de-lisiting and liquidation, cash was returned to investors in accordance with termination agreements, so investors did not usually suffer a monetary loss. However, moribund ETPs tend to have wide spreads and thin volumes, meaning they may become relatively expensive to trade. The removal of some ETPs from the market is arguably a good thing for investors. But at very least, closures can be a headache as they prompt more research to identify a replacement ETP, taking time and incurring costs.
True, there may have been tell-tale “closing down” signs with parallels in general retail; low AUM (poor footfall and sales), poor product placement (not filling a gap in the market) and a saturated playing field (too many competitors and low barriers to entry). But these signals are only informative if anticipated and understood in time.
In much the same way that failing businesses may close, so too might languishing ETPs. This is a Darwinian tale of the survival of the fittest and in part attests to the health of the ETP market. As with the High Street, the unrelenting downward pressure on fees offers little solace to the ETP minnow in a winner-takes-all market. Many products are not viable at the margin when perhaps £100m might be considered the lower bound of a fund’s AUM – especially if they carry an OCF of less than 0.1% p.a. The lower the fees, the higher the AUM threshold of survival. If you’re stacking ‘em high and selling ‘em cheap, you have to shift a huge volume just to cover costs.
Why Close Tactical Select Passive?
At Close Brothers Asset Management, we aim to avoid these pitfalls in our Close Tactical Select Passive Fund range by following a stringent due diligence process to partner with asset managers offering ETPs, and a strict methodology in choosing the right ETP to express our tactical asset allocation. Understanding not just an ETP’s absolute levels of AUM, but more importantly the market trends and investors’ appetite for the said product, are key.
The wider point is this: cheapest may mean biggest but cannot always, if ever, be synonymous with best. Quality has an intrinsic value of which cost is but one dimension. As the ETP market grows and matures, we must rightly continue to be discerning to ensure that only the best ETPs survive. Even if no absolute financial loss results from an ETP’s liquidation, the headache of replacing it bears a cost which, in the ETP providers’ world of fractional gains and vanishing headline fees, can chip away at performance at the portfolio level.
1ETP: Exchanged Traded Products (includes ETF, Exchange Traded Funds, ETC, Exchanged Traded Commodities, ETN, Exchange Traded Note).
2Bloomberg Opinion: “1,000 Dead ETFs is Cause for Celebration”, 29th November 2019.
3FT Adviser, 30 September 2019.
4DWS Q&A Factsheet, October 2019.
This article is only intended for use by UK investment professionals and should not be distributed to or relied upon by retail clients. The value of investments will go up and down and clients may get back less money than they invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The information contained in this document is believed to be correct but cannot be guaranteed. Opinions constitute our judgment as at the date shown and are subject to change without notice. This document is not intended as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell securities, nor does it constitute a personal recommendation.